guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-whyareyoulikethissad
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-whyareyoulikethissad channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-10 04:15 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
criminal
Case Number
CR-136-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-10 04:19 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge Singhski.
Xerxy
Xerxy 2025-07-10 04:19 p.m.
Assigned to Judge @singhski
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-10 05:16 p.m.
@vloqsouls
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-10 05:17 p.m.
Case Modified
@vloqsouls has added @JaroCycle to the case channel.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-10 05:17 p.m.
@JaroCycle AOPC and CC?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-10 05:18 p.m.
CI*
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-11 08:57 a.m.
@vloqsouls
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:03 a.m.
Ok probable cause found
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:08 a.m.
@JaroCycle Draft summons
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-11 10:08 a.m.
Why should i draft it, m'lord
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-11 10:08 a.m.
Respectfully but you are the clerk
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-11 10:08 a.m.
It's your duty
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:09 a.m.
Because I am taking the meanest dump atm and I'm asking you to
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-11 10:10 a.m.
I am at work atm too, so not available for the next 2-3 hours
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:14 a.m.
Ok whenever the summons is drafted I'll have a CCSO deputy serve it to the defendant
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:14 a.m.
in line with the rules of procedure
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:58 a.m.
@JaroCycle Disregard I already wrote the summons
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:58 a.m.
@clark county sheriff's office
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:59 a.m.
@Kezzera yo ping CCSO please
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 11:20 a.m.
meh i cba
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-11 11:21 a.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @excemeter(edited)
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-11 08:14 p.m.
Case Modified
@vloqsouls has added @excemeter to the case channel.
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 08:20 p.m.
Hello
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 08:36 p.m.
Hi
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 08:36 p.m.
Have you found a lawyer or do you need a public defender
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Have you found a lawyer or do you need a public defender
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 08:47 p.m.
I need a public defender(edited)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 08:59 p.m.
Don't edit messages
excemeterexcemeter
I need a public defender(edited)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 08:59 p.m.
Ok
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 08:59 p.m.
I'll let them know and see if they can take your case
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Don't edit messages
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 09:16 p.m.
ok
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
I'll let them know and see if they can take your case
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 09:16 p.m.
ty for the help
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-11 09:46 p.m.
Case Modified
@vloqsouls has added @Fish to the case channel.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 09:46 p.m.
Hello Chief Public Defender @Fish
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 09:46 p.m.
Submit a NOA whenever
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Hello Chief Public Defender @Fish
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 10:03 p.m.
Is he going to be my attorney?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-11 10:05 p.m.
@vloqsouls Where is your authority to preside over this proceeding derived from
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-11 10:05 p.m.
You are not a magistrate, are you?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-11 10:13 p.m.
And we move to set aside summons because they were not done by a sheriff’s deputy
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-11 10:13 p.m.
And the PC finding β€” a clerk does not have the authority to determine PC
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-11 10:18 p.m.
:πŸ₯²:
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
@vloqsouls Where is your authority to preside over this proceeding derived from
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:21 p.m.
It derives from the edict of the Indian gods and of the Allahabad High Court Judicature
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-11 10:24 p.m.
By the way Playboi Curry is dropping at 11PM EST so stay tuned
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-11 10:25 p.m.
..
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 06:18 a.m.
@Fish I have authorized him to make those decisions on my behalf.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 06:19 a.m.
PC is established, every decision he made was run through me first.(edited)
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 06:56 a.m.
and you're estopped from making that argument anyways because you assented to his authority in a previous case
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 06:57 a.m.
Not to mention you absolutely did benefit off of it because the defendant in that case was acquitted
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 06:58 a.m.
"It is called an estoppel or conclusion, because a man's own act or acceptance stoppeth or closeth up his mouth to allege or plead the truth." 2 Edward Coke, Institutes of the Laws of England 352a (1797).
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 10:30 a.m.
When do we wanna do arraignment @JaroCycle @Fish
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-12 10:41 a.m.
As soon as possible
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 10:58 a.m.
We can do it async if timezones are an issue
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 10:58 a.m.
On Discord
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
And we move to set aside summons because they were not done by a sheriff’s deputy
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 11:32 a.m.
^
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 11:37 a.m.
This will be rectified immediately. Although for the future I think it would be a good idea to deputize the clerkFlow bot.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 11:37 a.m.
@Clark County Sheriff's Office Please serve a copy of this summons to the defendant @excemeter
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 11:41 a.m.
Ping me for proof of summons and it will be sent here.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 11:41 a.m.
service*
SinghskiSinghski
and you're estopped from making that argument anyways because you assented to his authority in a previous case
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:10 p.m.
no im not
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:11 p.m.
it's an ultra vires act so i cannot be estopped
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:12 p.m.
a clerk is a ministerial position so you cannot confer your authority to him unless statute allows you to
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:16 p.m.
I establish PC
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:16 p.m.
Did you or did your clerk?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:16 p.m.
Me
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:17 p.m.
We will begin an asynchronous arraignment
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:17 p.m.
ARRAIGNMENT TRANSCRIPTION HAS BEGUN
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:17 p.m.
He hasn't been summoned properly
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:17 p.m.
We're waiting for CCSO
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:18 p.m.
And actually I would ask that you personally send the summons to CCSO. I believe, if I recall correctly, that the rule dictates that a judge deliver it to a Sheriff's Deputy, not their clerk
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:19 p.m.
Thank you for raising this at the arraignment.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:19 p.m.
I actually raised this before
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:19 p.m.
If you read
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
And we move to set aside summons because they were not done by a sheriff’s deputy
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:19 p.m.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:21 p.m.
no you can raise it at the arraignment
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:21 p.m.
he is being summoned properly
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:21 p.m.
So did you send it to the Sheriff's Deputy?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:21 p.m.
??
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:21 p.m.
"I believe, if I recall correctly, that the rule dictates that a judge deliver it to a Sheriff's Deputy, not their clerk"
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
"he is being summoned properly"
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
If you can read.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
I'm confirming
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
Did you or did you not?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
"I believe, if I recall correctly, that the rule dictates that a judge deliver it to a Sheriff's Deputy, not their clerk"
"he is being summoned properly"
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
Did you or did you not?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:22 p.m.
He is being summoned properly (emphasis added)
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:23 p.m.
I would appreciate if you could answer my question
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:24 p.m.
It's a simple yes or no
SinghskiSinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-12 04:26 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @ColonelCarm to the case channel.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:26 p.m.
Who is this
ColonelCarm
ColonelCarm 2025-07-12 04:26 p.m.
ColonelCarm
ColonelCarm 2025-07-12 04:27 p.m.
proof of service
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:27 p.m.
Why didnt CCSO listen to me when I pinged them
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:28 p.m.
You need to have them on speed dial
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:28 p.m.
@singhski I would actually move for you to recuse from this proceeding.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:28 p.m.
For what reason?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:28 p.m.
I have now come to realization of information that you attempted to get my LETC Certification revoked in Ridgeway, which raises the appearance of impartiality.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
Denied, this is false.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
Well, that's funny, because you admitted it yourself.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
I do not recall this.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
Would you like a picture?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
Yes
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I have now come to realization of information that you attempted to get my LETC Certification revoked in Ridgeway, which raises the appearance of impartiality.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:29 p.m.
I think you meant partiality
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:30 p.m.
Because to be impartial is to not hold any biases
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:30 p.m.
Yes a typo
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:30 p.m.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
@Clark County Sheriff's Office Please serve a copy of this summons to the defendant @excemeter
ColonelCarm
ColonelCarm 2025-07-12 04:31 p.m.
also this literally didn't ping me, idk if anyone has that role but I do not as CCSO, might be why nobody served(edited)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:31 p.m.
Could you run /verify in bot-commands because rover can't seem to update everyone without premium
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:31 p.m.
Stupid bot
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:32 p.m.
I appreciate the service though
ColonelCarm
ColonelCarm 2025-07-12 04:32 p.m.
Okay all good
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Click to see attachment.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:32 p.m.
Do you have evidence that I made a serious attempt to remove your LETC certification in Ridgeway? e.g, report to LETC
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
There does not need to be evidence of that. The only thing that matters is when your impartiality might be questioned, and the appearance of bias. You yourself admitted that you are working on getting it revoked, so that is more than enough to suffice as prima facie evidence of a personal bias.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
No? I admitted that I was working on destroying you in court?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
No, you didn't.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
I will add BrendaPopplewell who will testify to this.
SinghskiSinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Brenda to the case channel.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:35 p.m.
@Brenda Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:36 p.m.
@Fish Pause.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
BRENDAPOPPLEWELL: "[A]nyways, so when is his LETC cert being removed[?]"

SINGHSKI: "Gardai?"

BRENDAPOPPLEWELL: "Mhm[.] I've destroyed him on multiple occasions in court.'

SINGHSKI: "We're working on it woman omg."
SinghskiSinghski
@Fish Pause.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
Sorry didn't see
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
Hello?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
Why am I being sumomned
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
You are being summoned to testify as to uh
SinghskiSinghski
Do you have evidence that I made a serious attempt to remove your LETC certification in Ridgeway? e.g, report to LETC
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:37 p.m.
This
SinghskiSinghski
@Brenda Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:38 p.m.
@Brenda
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:38 p.m.
I'm sorry? I'm being called to testify about something from a year ago?
SinghskiSinghski
@Brenda Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:38 p.m.
I do
BrendaBrenda
I'm sorry? I'm being called to testify about something from a year ago?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 04:38 p.m.
Well it's a point of contention for recusal atm due to a question of partiality, so yes
BrendaBrenda
I do
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:41 p.m.
What is the context of the above attached conversation that took place on the 18th of July, 2024 at 11:30 AM?
SinghskiSinghski
What is the context of the above attached conversation that took place on the 18th of July, 2024 at 11:30 AM?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:42 p.m.
To the best of my recollection, the Center for Individual Rights was litigating a lawsuit against James_Gardai for official misconduct
BrendaBrenda
To the best of my recollection, the Center for Individual Rights was litigating a lawsuit against James_Gardai for official misconduct
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:43 p.m.
Thank you. When Dr. Singhski said, β€˜We’re working on it woman omg,’ were you under the impression that he was referring to your statement about destroying Gardai in court?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:45 p.m.
I was under the impression that "working on it" meant suing him, and, by direct or indirect consequence thereof, having his license revoked
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 04:46 p.m.
However, I did not believe it meant filing a complaint with the LETC
BrendaBrenda
I was under the impression that "working on it" meant suing him, and, by direct or indirect consequence thereof, having his license revoked
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:46 p.m.
Thank you, that is all
SinghskiSinghski used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-12 04:48 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has removed @Brenda from the case channel.
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Click to see attachment.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:49 p.m.
@Fish When did you discover this?
SinghskiSinghski
@Fish When did you discover this?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:51 p.m.
Do you mean the first time or what?
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Do you mean the first time or what?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:51 p.m.
Yes
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:52 p.m.
I probably saw that conversation a long time ago, I couldn't tell you exactly when, but I recalled something that you said about me there recently and rediscovered it
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I probably saw that conversation a long time ago, I couldn't tell you exactly when, but I recalled something that you said about me there recently and rediscovered it
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:54 p.m.
Why did you not inform the Court of this in <#1383909232600158298> ?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:55 p.m.
Because I did not recall anything at that time
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:55 p.m.
If I did, I certainly woul dhave
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:55 p.m.
But, you knew that such messages existed? You did not discover them today. You, in your own words, discovered them "[a] long time ago".
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:57 p.m.
It was a lapse in memory. As Brenda said, it was over a year ago so I did not recall at that time
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
It was a lapse in memory. As Brenda said, it was over a year ago so I did not recall at that time
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:57 p.m.
It seems awfully convenient that you remembered it today.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:58 p.m.
Okay?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:58 p.m.
I will be recusing because I had the defendant blocked only a day or two ago.
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 04:58 p.m.
@Xerxy Reassign.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 04:58 p.m.
Okay.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-12 05:00 p.m.
Quite concerning that you didn't recuse earlier yourself if you had the defendant blocked
Brenda
Brenda 2025-07-12 05:00 p.m.
-she estoppels his mouth.-
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Quite concerning that you didn't recuse earlier yourself if you had the defendant blocked
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-12 05:00 p.m.
I remembered just now
BrendaBrenda
-she estoppels his mouth.-
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 05:00 p.m.
Excuse me???
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-12 05:00 p.m.
Case Modified
@vloqsouls has removed @Brenda from the case channel.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-12 05:08 p.m.
We don't do none of that here
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-12 06:46 p.m.
what happens if I have stuff to do tomorrow?
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-12 06:50 p.m.
who is my public defendant :πŸ₯²:
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-13 02:07 a.m.
Can we reschedule for July 14th, 3:00 pm UTC-7?(edited)
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-13 02:07 a.m.
I have plans with family tomorrow
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-14 12:55 a.m.
hello??
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-14 12:57 a.m.
:πŸ₯²:
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-07-14 07:23 a.m.
@Xerxy when will this be reassigned
SinghskiSinghski
I will be recusing because I had the defendant blocked only a day or two ago.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-20 08:14 a.m.
@vloqsouls SIR WE NEED REASSIGNMENT.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-20 06:42 p.m.
I made a request a while ago
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-20 06:42 p.m.
I can't reassign myself :πŸ’”:
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-21 06:56 a.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Pls?
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-21 11:53 a.m.
@Fish Don't worry, we will just assign to @vloqsouls
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-21 11:56 a.m.
Oh I forgot about this ngl
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-21 11:57 a.m.
Where were we at previously with this @Fish @JaroCycle
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-21 11:58 a.m.
@vloqsouls actually no
Singhski
Singhski 2025-07-21 11:58 a.m.
new person unless james doesn't object
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-21 11:58 a.m.
Right
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:00 p.m.
who is my public defendant :πŸ₯²:
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:16 p.m.
do I currently have a public defendant? or can I hire an attorney
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-21 02:19 p.m.
JamesGardai is your current counsel of record and the Chief Public Defender.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
JamesGardai is your current counsel of record and the Chief Public Defender.
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:21 p.m.
so he is the one that's representing my case? he's my attorney / public defender?(edited)
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:22 p.m.
I'm not familiar with the US court, I'm not American.
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:22 p.m.
I'm sorry if I don't understand.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
JamesGardai is your current counsel of record and the Chief Public Defender.
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:25 p.m.
Oh alr I understand now I had to look it up, am I allowed to speak with him in private?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-21 02:26 p.m.
Yes
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Yes
excemeter
excemeter 2025-07-21 02:26 p.m.
Alright thank you
SinghskiSinghski
new person unless james doesn't object
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-21 07:44 p.m.
I object, yes.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-22 07:58 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Hello this needs reassignment pls
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-07-30 06:35 p.m.
@Underprothonotary Reassign this without further delay.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-31 02:01 a.m.
@Nicklaus Excuse me.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-07-31 02:01 a.m.
Let it be known that we assert our right to a speedy trial.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-01 08:49 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Hello
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-01 08:49 p.m.
@Kezzera Hello
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-01 08:49 p.m.
@<@&1400357079969042524> Hello
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
@Prothonotary of Court HELP US PLEASE.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
@vloqsouls
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
@Kezzera
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
@meowiitten
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-03 12:18 a.m.
Can you help us?
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2025-08-07 04:15 a.m.
Hi
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2025-08-07 04:15 a.m.
What do you need
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-07 03:25 p.m.
Reassign This Case Immediately. @cabot
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-07 03:25 p.m.
Do not test my patience, Boy.
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2025-08-07 07:44 p.m.
Sigh
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-13 11:01 a.m.
@vloqsouls Sir
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:44 p.m.
Honestly I should just preside
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
@vloqsouls Sir
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:47 p.m.
You did ask for reassignment; unless you want to go back on your request, in which case you'll be estopped from making any arguments relating to my impartiality under Mayfl. Jud. Admin. R. 8(d), then your only option is to wait.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:48 p.m.
As much as I'd like to expedite the reassignment process that's a job for the clerks
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:49 p.m.
@Underprothonotary Get on this asap.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:52 p.m.
@General Staff
Your Local Dreamer
Your Local Dreamer 2025-08-14 01:53 p.m.
only the court clerks have now the proper perms to reassign sadly
Your Local Dreamer
Your Local Dreamer 2025-08-14 01:53 p.m.
courtroom 1s can't
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:54 p.m.
Well I figure maybe you can whisper to your judge that this case exists
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:54 p.m.
maybe they'll have some initiative and take it
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:56 p.m.
@vloqsouls i never had a problem with you presiding(edited)
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:56 p.m.
it was singhski with the coi
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I object, yes.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:56 p.m.
?
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
?
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:56 p.m.
Because singshki is the supervisor
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:57 p.m.
the case is still under his docket lol(edited)
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:57 p.m.
since you're a DCJ now I have no problem with you doing it
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:57 p.m.
As you wish
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:58 p.m.
But just to be clear you can no longer make any arguments for my recusal based on that
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 01:59 p.m.
On that basis**
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:59 p.m.
Why would I need you to recuse for any other reason
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:59 p.m.
The only reason was because you were a mag at the time and he was supervising all decisions
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 01:59 p.m.
I will have a dismissal motion soon
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 02:00 p.m.
Ok
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 02:01 p.m.
@JaroCycle We're back with this by the way
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:11 p.m.
@vloqsouls actually we never did arraignment
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:11 p.m.
we should do that first and then i can submit any motions
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:24 p.m.
@vloqsouls Nevermind
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:24 p.m.
I move to set aside summons as it was done improperly
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:25 p.m.
copy of the information was not attached to summons https://drive.google.com/file/d/12Om-b5A7_zFt8jULscp8FuBQdHKuHLSc/view
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 02:25 p.m.
IN FELONY - In every case of felony, the presiding judge where an information has been presented, and probable cause has been established, shall deliver such copy to a Sheriff's Deputy, together with a writ directed to such Deputy, commanding him forthwith to deliver such certified copy to the accused.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 05:13 p.m.
Denied. The defendant has willingly surrendered himself to the jurisdiction of this Court and has demonstrated his willingness to engage in proceedings.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 05:16 p.m.
A copy of a criminal information not attached to a criminal summons is a minor deviation.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 05:17 p.m.
@Fish @JaroCycle When can we schedule for arraignment
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Denied. The defendant has willingly surrendered himself to the jurisdiction of this Court and has demonstrated his willingness to engage in proceedings.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 07:43 p.m.
Not really
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 07:44 p.m.
The motion is timely since it's pre-arraignment
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 07:44 p.m.
But ok we will appeal when the time comes(edited)
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 07:44 p.m.
I am available whenever(edited)
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-14 07:44 p.m.
I think it might be better to do asynchronous arraignment
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-14 07:55 p.m.
@JaroCycle
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I think it might be better to do asynchronous arraignment
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-08-15 01:46 a.m.
Agree to that
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:46 p.m.
Alright
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:46 p.m.
@Fish If you could please get the defendant to reply in a timely fashion it would be great(edited)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:46 p.m.
ARRAIGNMENT TRANSCRIPTION BEGINS HERE
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:47 p.m.
Mr. JaroCycle on behalf of the state, Mr. JamesGardai on behalf of Mr. WhyAreYouLikeThisSad, the defendant.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:48 p.m.
We are hereby convened this 15th of August in the matter entitled State of Mayflower v. WhyAreYouLikeThisSad, Case No. CR-136-25
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:48 p.m.
@excemeter Before we proceed any further, I must ensure that you understand you have the following rights:
1. You have the right to remain silent; you do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you;
2. You have the right to an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings; if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost;
3. You have the right to a fair public trial where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf;
4. You have the right to confront witnesses against you and test their evidence; you can question them in court.
(edited)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-15 01:49 p.m.
Do you understand these rights as I have read them to you
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Do you understand these rights as I have read them to you
excemeter
excemeter 2025-08-15 10:11 p.m.
Yes I do
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:27 a.m.
Mr. WhyAreYouLikeThisSad, you hereby stand accused of one felony and one misdemeanor offense; one count of Assault with a Deadly Weapon (1 M.S.C. Β§ 2302) and one count of Brandishing a Firearm in City Limits (1 M.S.C. Β§ 7101). The charges carry a maximum penalty of 23 minutes incarceration, and 10 minutes of incarceration and a $1,500 fine respectively. The charges are briefly described as follows:
COUNT ONE: "The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about the 29th day of June, 2025, the defendant confronted the victim in the city of Mersea, in front of the Coin O’Matic business building. The defendant, unprovoked and without legal justification, unholstered his weapon and pointed it at the victim maliciously and causing reasonable fear to the victim. The victim posed no threat to the defendant and did nothing to provoke such actions; therefore, the defendant is charged with of 1.M.S.C. Β§ 2302."
COUNT TWO: "The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about the 29th day of June, 2025, the defendant confronted the victim in the city of Mersea, in front of the Coin O’Matic business building. The defendant then maliciously unholstered his weapon and pointed it at the victim without legal justification pursuant to Title 5, Subtitle 1, Chapter 5, Subchapter 2 of the State Code nor was he reloading a newly purchased weapon; therefore, the defendant is charged 1.M.S.C Β§7101."
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:27 a.m.
Do you understand these charges brought forth against you? @excemeter
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Do you understand these charges brought forth against you? @excemeter
excemeter
excemeter 2025-08-16 04:53 a.m.
Yes I do
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:07 p.m.
As to Count One: Assault with a Deadly Weapon (1 M.S.C. Β§ 2302), how do you plead? @excemeter
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
As to Count One: Assault with a Deadly Weapon (1 M.S.C. Β§ 2302), how do you plead? @excemeter
excemeter
excemeter 2025-08-16 12:13 p.m.
Not guilty+
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:14 p.m.
As to Count Two: Brandishing a Firearm in City Limits (1 M.S.C. Β§ 7101), how do you plead?
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
As to Count Two: Brandishing a Firearm in City Limits (1 M.S.C. Β§ 7101), how do you plead?
excemeter
excemeter 2025-08-16 12:49 p.m.
Not guilty
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:51 p.m.
Thank you.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:51 p.m.
ARRAIGNMENT TRANSCRIPTION ENDS HERE
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:52 p.m.
MINUTE ENTRY Arraignment as to Counts 1 and 2 held on 08/16/2025. WHYAREYOULIKETHISSAD appeared with counsel. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 1 and 2. (Entered: 08/16/2025)(edited)
vloqsouls pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/pretrial
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 12:53 p.m.
Pretrial Schedule
Discovery will be taken care of separately during the pretrial period.

Pre-trial motions will be accepted until Sunday, August 24, 2025 at 12:53 p.m. or 5 months ago.

The pre-trial period will end on Tuesday, August 26, 2025 at 12:53 p.m. or 5 months ago.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:55 p.m.
PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from the 16th of August, concluding on the 26th of August 2025 barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By August 26th, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. (Entered: 08/16/2025 by Hon. District Court Judge vloqsouls).
vloqsouls pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:56 p.m.
PAPERLESS BRADY ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidenceβ€”namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's caseβ€”as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. (Entered 08/16/2025 by Hon. District Court Judge vloqsouls).
vloqsouls pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
Click to see command.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 12:57 p.m.
@Fish @JaroCycle
vloqsouls pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-16 01:02 p.m.
Defendant's Motion for Discovery
@vloqsouls @JaroCycle
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Defendant's Motion for Discovery @vloqsouls @JaroCycle
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-16 01:31 p.m.
@JaroCycle Any objections?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-17 04:31 p.m.
@JaroCycle Hello!
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
@JaroCycle Hello!
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-08-17 04:44 p.m.
Spologizes, no objections
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Defendant's Motion for Discovery @vloqsouls @JaroCycle
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-17 04:50 p.m.
So ordered.
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
Defendant's Motion for Discovery @vloqsouls @JaroCycle
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-17 11:13 p.m.
Submit this to the website asap and follow our naming conventions @Fish
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-18 02:07 a.m.
No access
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-18 10:56 a.m.
Sigh.... @singhski
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
Click to see command.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-24 04:36 p.m.
@Fish @JaroCycle Reminder
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-24 04:46 p.m.
I’m waiting on them to send theirs
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 03:27 p.m.
@JaroCycle Where is your discovery
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 03:27 p.m.
We're past the deadline
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-26 11:41 p.m.
@vloqsouls we move to dismiss with prejudice on the account that the state has not provided their discovery
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 11:56 p.m.
Hold that thought because that is a big leap you are making counselor
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 11:56 p.m.
Maybe the intern at the DOJ misplaced the discovery files and it got lost
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 11:57 p.m.
@JaroCycle If you do not submit your discovery by the time I wake up tomorrow morning this will be dismissed for want of prosecution
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
@vloqsouls we move to dismiss with prejudice on the account that the state has not provided their discovery
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 11:58 p.m.
Dismissal with prejudice is something Courts generally only consider when there's actual prejudice suffered as a result of discovery violations. Here, the State just hasn't submitted discovery at all
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-26 11:58 p.m.
Im not opposing a dismissal with prejudice but you're going to have to write up a full brief in support if you want me to grant that remedy
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 12:00 a.m.
Now I will be going to sleep, by the time I wake up in 8 hours I better hope to see a discovery submission here
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
Im not opposing a dismissal with prejudice but you're going to have to write up a full brief in support if you want me to grant that remedy
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-27 01:00 a.m.
I would just direct you to State v. Gavin 1 Rid. 74 (2022) and the Chief Justice’s dissenting opinion in TrexeoDev
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:02 a.m.
Good morning
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:02 a.m.
Since I don't see discovery here's what's gonna happen
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I would just direct you to State v. Gavin 1 Rid. 74 (2022) and the Chief Justice’s dissenting opinion in TrexeoDev
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:06 a.m.
I don't find Ridgeway precedent persuasive unless its materially relevant.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
I don't find Ridgeway precedent persuasive unless its materially relevant.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:13 a.m.
Prior judges in other ROBLOX jurisdictions may be enlightened but we have a Constitution for Mayflowerians and all individuals within our state.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:16 a.m.
As for your citation of TrexeoDev I want you to bake me a cake not buy me skittles @Fish
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:20 a.m.
What actual and substantial prejudice has arisen from this delay in discovery submission that would warrant a dismissal with prejudice?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:20 a.m.
Or well it's absence thereof
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 10:23 a.m.
Which no other remedy could possibly rectify?
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
What actual and substantial prejudice has arisen from this delay in discovery submission that would warrant a dismissal with prejudice?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 11:00 a.m.
Im not referring to Barker v. Wingo by the way which TrexeoDev primarily focuses on but rather United States v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361 (1981)
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 11:03 a.m.
β€œCases involving Sixth Amendment deprivations are subject to the general rule that remedies should be tailored to the injury suffered from the constitutional violation, and should not unnecessarily infringe on competing interests.” Id. at 364
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 11:03 a.m.
Again for the sake of argument we are assuming that there is a 6A violation here
JamesGardaiJamesGardai
I would just direct you to State v. Gavin 1 Rid. 74 (2022) and the Chief Justice’s dissenting opinion in TrexeoDev
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-27 12:35 p.m.
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-27 02:21 p.m.
Ok
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-28 05:18 p.m.
@Fish Hello where is my brief for dismissal with prejudice!
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-28 05:20 p.m.
If I dont get one I'll just dismiss w/o prej
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
@Fish Hello where is my brief for dismissal with prejudice!
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-28 05:45 p.m.
Bro it’s been one day
JamesGardai
JamesGardai 2025-08-28 05:45 p.m.
Like chill ill write it this weekend
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
Meet me at the hotel room
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
:🎡::🎢:
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
Meet me at the hotel room
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
:🎡::🎢:
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
Meet me at the hotel room
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:08 p.m.
:🎡::🎢:
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:09 p.m.
Meet me at the hotel room
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:09 p.m.
Forget about your boyfriend and meet me at the hotel room
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:09 p.m.
You can bring your girlfriends and meet me at the hotel room
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 11:29 p.m.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-02 01:47 p.m.
Dismissing without prejudice for want of prosecution @Fish @JaroCycle
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-02 01:47 p.m.
Formalized ruling to follow
shah_khaled α΄˜α΄„
shah_khaled α΄˜α΄„ 2025-09-12 10:16 a.m.
@vloqsouls archive?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-12 10:20 a.m.
I HAVE TO WRITE UP THE RULING WAIT!!!!!!!
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-12 10:21 a.m.
AND WHO THE FUCK MESSED UP MY CATEGORY @Underprothonotary @Courtroom Manager
Doogy
Doogy 2025-09-12 10:24 a.m.
?
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-12 10:27 a.m.
WHO DID THIS
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-12 10:27 a.m.
WHO NAMED IT "CHAMBERS OF MONKEY VLOQSOULS"
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-09-18 03:31 p.m.
Fornalizing ruling this weekend TM
πŸ€₯12
krabz
krabz 2025-10-05 07:01 p.m.
Transitional Case

This case existed prior to courts.clarkcounty.site shutting down. This card has been created to keep a record of the case’s existence; however, it will not be updated with past, present, or future case information.
Labels
Transitional Case, Criminal
krabz pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-10-07 12:54 a.m.
Ok I'll actually do this not even trolling.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-10-25 03:48 p.m.
vloqsoulsvloqsouls used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 03:48 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 03:48 p.m.
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-10-25 03:49 p.m.
@excemeter You are free son
vloqsoulsvloqsouls
@excemeter You are free son
excemeter
excemeter 2025-11-15 10:44 p.m.
:🫑:
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2025-11-29 01:33 p.m.
Is this done
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2026-01-18 12:26 p.m.
Pls archive as dismissed earlier
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„
Chancellor Cabot α΄˜α΄„ 2026-01-18 12:26 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office
profileprofile used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 12:27 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 12:27 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 12:27 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XV.
Exported 341 messages